Clark County Medical Society

County Line

Newsletter XLI     June 2003

 

Contents

Health Care Practitioner Reporting

President’s Message

2003-2004 CCMS Board of Trustees

New Members

Membership Applicants

CEO Editorial

Position of the Clark County Medical Society (CCMS) Regarding Proposed Nevada State Board of Medical Examiners (NSBME) Physician Competency Regulations for Re-licensure

Minutes Synopsis

Malpractice Filings

Calendar of Events

CME Calendar

Clark County Health District Disease Statistics – April 2003

Alliance Message

Classifieds

County Line Advertisers

 

 

Health Care Practitioner Reporting

National Practitioner Data Bank and Health Care Integrity and Protection Data Bank

 

By Weldon (Don) Havins, MD, Esq.

C.E.O. and Special Counsel

            The Health Care Quality Improvement Act of 1986 (HCQIA), 42 USC 1111, et seq, provided for the establishment of the National Practitioner Data Bank (NPDB).  The purpose of the NPDB, which became operational on September 1, 1990, is to "protect patients from poorly performing practitioners and allow health care entities and state licensing boards to make more informed decisions regarding licensing and credentialing."  Hospital clinical privileges sanction actions (over 30 days and involving patient quality care issues) and medical malpractice payments of any amount must be reported to the NPDB.  Licensure sanction actions and Medicare/Medicaid exclusions must also be reported.  Hospitals are required to query NPDB for every physician on their staff every two years.  State licensing boards and managed care organizations may query the NPDB without limitation.  Physicians and dentists, the only subjects of the NPDB, may self-query the NPDB regarding their own information held by the NPDB.  The public may not query the NPDB.

 

HOSPITAL AND HEALTH CARE ORGANIZATION REPORTING

Adverse actions by health care organizations, such as hospitals, are reportable if they are in effect for at least 30 days.  (See NPDB Guidebook - available online at http://www.npdb.com/pubs/gb/NPDB%20Guidebook.pdf)   Summary, or interim, suspensions must also be reported if they were made to prevent imminent danger to the health of any individual.  A hospital must report acceptance of a physician's voluntary resignation of staff privileges if the physician is under investigation for possible incompetence or improper conduct, or surrenders his or her privileges to avoid an investigation.  Hospital staffs should be aware that courts have held that immunity for good-faith reporting to the NPDB does not apply when there has been inadequate investigation prior to revoking a physician's staff privileges [Brown v. Presbyterian Healthcare Services, 101 F.3d 1324 (10th Cir. 1996)] and when the revocation was based on a false report [holding that a reasonable jury could find that the person making the report knew it was false - Simon v. Union Hosp., 1999 WL 95774 (4th Cir.)]  A hospital may be liable for the original report and for all reasonably foreseeable "republications" of the report by the NPDB. [Stephan v Baylor Medical Center, 20 S.W.3d 880 (Tex.App. - Dallas 2000)].  Delay in correcting a false NPDB may support a defamation claim for republications of the report prior to the correction.  [Wuchenich v Shenandoah Memorial Hosp., 215 F.3d 1324 (4th Cir. 2000)].  Interestingly, over 50% of "active" registered hospitals have never submitted a clinical privileges report to the NPDB.

 

CHALLENGING INFORMATION IN THE NPDB

If a physician or dentist does not agree with their information held by the NPDB, the practitioner can provide a statement which becomes part of the NPDB reports, can notify the reporting entity and ask that a correction be sent to the NPDB, or can initiate a dispute and/or Secretarial Review process.  A practitioner may dispute either the factual accuracy of the action described in a report or whether the report was submitted in accordance with Data Bank reporting requirements (i.e., was a reportable event).  The Secretarial Review of a report may result in three main decisions by the Secretary:

 

1.  Out of Scope

            The report is no longer in dispute and the practitioner may add a statement.  The only issues raised concern whether a payment should have been made or an action should have been taken.

2.  Accurate

            An explanation of the decision is sent to the practitioner.  The practitioner may add a statement to the report.

3.  Inaccurate

            The report is ordered corrected or is voided.

 

PENALTIES FOR NON-REPORTING AND FOR IMPROPER DISCLOSURE

            Federal law provides Civil Money Penalties of up to $11,000 per instance for failure to report (to the NPDB), or for violation of confidentiality of NPDB reported information.  The United States Code of Federal Regulations (45 CFR Ch. V section 1003.102(b)) provides that the OIG (Office of Inspector General, Health Care, HHS) "may impose a penalty … against any person … whom it determines … improperly discloses, uses or permits access to information reported…."  Section 1003.103(c) provides the OIG may impose a penalty of not more than $11,000 … for each improper disclosure, use of access" to NPDB information.  Since 1991, these penalties apply for negligent failure to report and for negligent disclosure or use, as well as intentional or reckless failure to report, or improper disclosure or use. 

 

HOW TO OBTAIN YOUR NPDB INFORMATION

            Extensive information about the NPDB and the HIPDB is available on the web site:  http://www.npdb-hipdb.com    Forms for practitioner self query of the data bases are available on this web site.  The cost is $10 for a report from either of the data banks and this must be paid with a credit card, online, at the time of completing the query form.  The completed query form does require notarization before mailing to the NPDB.  CCMS members may obtain notarization of their forms, free of charge, from either Dot Freel, CCMS office manager, or from Deborah Barton, CCMS public relations coordinator, at the medical society office during normal working hours.  Please call the society, 739-9989, before arriving at the office to ascertain that one of them is available. 

 

HOW WELL IS THE NPDB WORKING?

            Through 2001, about 180,000 reports have been made against individual practitioners with about 70% of those against physicians.  Over 70% of reports concerned malpractice payments, and 9% of those were obstetrics related cases, which have the highest average malpractice payment amounts.  Medical malpractice payers (professional liability insurers or individual uninsured physicians and dentists) must submit reports to the NPDB within 30 days of the date of payment.  Insured individual practitioners are NOT required to report to the NPDB.  If an individual is dismissed before settlement or judgment, there should be no report on the individual, unless the dismissal was a condition of the settlement and a payment occurred.  In settling a malpractice suit brought against a hospital (or other entity, such as a physician's corporation) and an individual physician, the parties may agree to drop the individual physician's name from the suit to avoid the NPDB reporting requirement.  Dropping the suit against the physician avoids the subsequent adverse effects on the physician's malpractice insurance premiums since corporations are not reported to the NPDB.  This use of the "corporate shield" strategy to protect physician reporting is the subject of proposed changes to the regulations.  The proposed regulations clarify that practitioners, for whose benefit payment is made, must be reported even if the practitioner is not named in the malpractice action.  This language is likely to engender troublesome and complex determinations of which "un-named practitioners" are the motive for the payment made.

 

REQUIRED REPORTING TO THE HIPDB

            The Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) of 1996 provided for the establishment of the Healthcare Integrity and Protection Data Bank (HIPDB).  This data bank is designed to identify health care practitioners, providers, and suppliers who may be involved in acts of health care fraud and abuse.  The reports to the HIPDB involve practitioners, providers, and suppliers.  The data bank contains reports of health care related criminal convictions, health care related civil judgments, and other adjudicated actions.  The HIPDB may be queried by federal and state government agencies and health plans.  Health care providers, suppliers, and practitioners may self-query only.  Like the NPDB, the HIPDB information is not public information and the public cannot query the data banks.   

            Health plans failing to report to the HIPDB can be fined up to $25,000 for each instance of failure to report.  Disputes as to the facts reported to the HIPDB can be addressed through the same process as that for the NPDB.

 

NEVADA STATE LAW REPORTING REQUIREMENTS

            AB 1 of the special session of the Legislature, 2002, mandates that licensee physicians report to their respective boards within 30 days of a medical malpractice claim filed against them in District Court.  Unfortunately for licensees, a claim filed in District Court may not be served upon the defendant for up to 120 days after the date of filing. (Nevada Rules of Civil Procedure, Rule 4)  Thus, a licensee is required to report to the licensing board, at times, before the licensee physician has received notice of being sued.  Non-compliance with this legislative statute alone can base a licensure disciplinary action. 

            Licensees can query the Blackstone database of the Eighth Judicial District (Clark County) and enter their name into a "party search" to determine if a claim has been filed against them.  Information on filings are entered into the database within 2 days of filing, normally.  Physicians should search both under their last name ("Doe") and their last name with their professional degree, "Doe (MD)" or "Doe (DO)".  There doesn't appear to be any other practical manner of determining whether a claim has been filed prior to receiving formal notice (service of the summons and complaint) of the lawsuit.  Again, this is a legislative mandate, not  regulations of the board.  However, the board is mandated by the legislature, through NRS 630.130, to enforce the provisions of NRS 630.

            A bill (SB 250) currently reposed in the Senate Judiciary Committee contains a provision which would amend this provision of Nevada law to require licensee reporting within 45 days of being served notice of the lawsuit.  Whether (or not) this amendment will be enacted into law remains to be seen.

            Licensees should also be aware that reports of medical malpractice settlements, judgments, arbitrations, and mediations must be reported to the respective licensing boards within 30 days.  This must be done by the licensee as well as the insurer.  Reports must also be made to the Division of Insurance and to the National Practitioner Data Bank by the insurer, or by the licensee if payment is made without involvement of an insurer.  SB 250, as presently constituted, provides for a licensee fine of up to $5,000 for non-reporting a medical malpractice claim within 45 days of receiving notice of the claim.

            Reporting of malpractice actions is mandated in both state and federal law.  Physicians should be familiar with those mandates and comply to avoid sanctions by either or both of the sovereigns.

 

Top

 

 

President’s Message

By Warren Evins, M.D., PhD, 2002-2003 CCMS President

Keep Our Doctors in Nevada

            I have to write these columns so far in advance (today is May 5th), that sometimes unexpected things happen.  Last month, the Nevada State Senate overturned the Judiciary committee's amendment to SB 97 (the Keep Our Doctors in Nevada -KODIN-

Initiative proposal in an amendable bill form).  The amendment deleted the entire bill by substituting some provisions penalizing professional liability insurers.  Only very rarely does the entire Senate overturn a Senate committee's extensive amendment.  The next day the Senate passed SB97 and sent it to the Assembly.

            Senator Mark Amodei (Capital Senatorial District), the Senate Judiciary committee Chairman and President pro Tempore of the Senate, voted against rejection of the amendment and then voted against passage of SB97.  He was the only republican to vote against the bill.  All of the other Republicans and one Democrat, Senator Michael Schneider (Clark, no. 11) voted for SB97.  All of the other Democratic Senators voted against the bill.

            The bill then went to the Assembly Judiciary committee, chaired by Bernie Anderson, Washoe, no. 31, the Assembly Majority Whip (Democrat).  What will occur in the Assembly is not yet known.  However, we have to be prepared to support an extensive and expensive drive to pass the Initiative proposal in the November 2004 general election if significant legislation such as SB 97 is not enacted into law.  We can expect the trial lawyers to raise constitutional issues and attempt to have the Nevada Supreme Court bar the Initiative proposal from the ballot.  KODIN's attorneys are prepared to defend the Initiative in court, but a lot more money will be needed.

            The 72nd Session of the Nevada State Legislature ends on Monday, June 2, 2003.  At this point, no tax compromises have been reached and it is unclear what new tax measures will be passed.  There has been some speculation about the occurrence of a Special Session only with taxation.

 

NSMA House of Delegates Meeting

            By the time that you receive this issue of County Line the 2003 Annual meeting of NSMA's House of Delegates at Reno's Atlantis Casino Resort will be history.  CCMS nominated Dr. Joseph Hardy, a Family Practice physician from Boulder City, past Boulder City councilman and Clark County Board of Health member, and current State Assemblyman, for the NSMA Community Service Physician of the Year.  He is scheduled to receive the award at the NSMA Banquet.

            Senators Ann O'Connell and Sandra Tiffany (both of Clark, no. 5) were nominated by CCMS and shared the 2003 Nick Horn Award for Non-Physician Community Service of the Year.  These two Senators established the Keep Our Doctors in Nevada Political Action Committee and organized the Initiative petition drive.  They acted as advisors to NSMA and CCMS on pending legislation, and counseled our lobbyists.  Senator O'Connell, especially, introduced and supported several bills on behalf of physicians.  We are proud that NSMA accepted our nominations for these prestigious awards.

 

Board of Medical Examiners

            The Nevada State Board of Medical Examiners (BME) held workshops to hear public testimony on the proposed competency regulations for MD license renewal in 2005.  The Reno workshop on April 29th drew 30-40 physicians and public citizens who all seemed opposed to the regulation.  On April 30th in Las Vegas, 60 to 70 physician and public attendees forced the workshop into a larger meeting room and spoke against the proposals.  Both NSMA and CCMS presented written and oral testimony opposing competency testing.  The BME is meeting in Reno (video-conferenced to Las Vegas) on May 30th to formally act on the Regulation changes.

 

Medicaid and Worker's Compensation Insurers Propose to Lower Physician Re-Imbursement

            The State of Nevada signed a contract with First Health, the low bidder, to oversee portions of the Nevada Medicaid program. First Health replaced Health Insight, Nevada's Quality Improvement Organization (previously known as a Peer Review Organization) in which NSMA and CCMS have participated.  Health Insight only held the contract for a matter of months, but had managed to eliminate the PAR (Prior Authorization request) requirements for most medications and simplified PARs for treatments and referrals.  Medicaid appears to be reverting to the onerous PAR system used previously.

            Medicare has adopted the so-called Resource Based Relative Value System (RBRVS) for physician payment.  Under this system, payments for cognitive (evaluation and management) services were supposed to substantially increase and payments for procedural services were expected to decrease.  However, Medicare instituted many budget cuts along the way.  Despite years of increased physician expenses, payments have not improved.  Medicare physician payments were to increase under a formula that severely restricted growth.  The initial calculation of the Medicare sustainable growth rate was done using incorrect numbers.  Despite extensive physician lobbying, the formula has not been corrected.  These continued miscalculations caused annual decreases in payments.  Another substantial decrease this year was narrowly averted when Congress made a temporary correction in the formula.  This correction was supposed to result in a small payment increase in 2004, but recent recalculations have projected another significant decrease.

            Physicians are receiving decreasing payments for Medicare services due to this flawed formula. Congress says it wants to correct the formula, but cannot pass the needed legislation (the same as with the Medicare medication benefit). Many private insurance companies have based their physician payments on a percentage of Medicare's allowed fees.  Now, both Medicaid and worker's compensation insurance carriers are attempting to change their payment schedules to a fixed percentage of Medicare's payments, using RBRVS.  These lower payments were apparently projected in Governor Guinn's recent budget.  We have protested these large budget cuts, which will significantly affect surgeons, orthopedists, anesthesiologists and pediatric specialists especially.

 

Installation of the 2003-2004 Officers and Board

            The installation of Dr Ed Kingsley, President, and the newly elected officers and Board of Trustee members is on May 31st at the Green Valley Ranch resort.  They will assume office on July 1st.  I offer them my best wishes.

 

Top

 

2003-2004 CCMS Board of Trustees

Edwin Kingsley, M.D.

President

3730 S Eastern Ave

Las Vegas, NV 89109

952-3400

 

Michael Colletti, M.D.

President-Elect

2470 E Flamingo Rd #D

Las Vegas, NV 89121

734-2242

 

Warren Evins, M.D. Ph.D.

Past President

1769 E Russell Rd

Las Vegas, NV 89119

383-3600

 

David Steinberg, M.D.

Treasurer

2767 N Tenaya Wy

Las Vegas, NV 89128

240-1232

 

LeRoy Bernstein, M.D.

Secretary

3006 S Maryland Pkwy #530

Las Vegas, NV 89109

796-7000

 

Carol van der Harten-Algier, M.D.

CCMS Delegate Chair

4230 S Burnham Ave #250

Las Vegas, NV 89119

733-7866

 

George Alexander, M.D.

Trustee

3150 N Tenaya Wy #620

Las Vegas, NV 89128

242-6776

 

Michael Clifford, M.D.

Trustee

7151 Cascade Valley Ct #103

Las Vegas, NV 89128

944-5444

 

Michael Gross, M.D.

Trustee

1750 E Desert Inn Rd #200

Las Vegas, NV 89109

732-2438

 

Florence Jameson, M.D.

Trustee

5281 S Eastern Ave

Las Vegas, NV 89119

262-9676

 

Jerry Jones, M.D.

Trustee

400 Shadow Ln #207

Las Vegas, NV 89106

384-5400

 

David Mulkey, M.D.

Trustee

4230 Burnham Ave #250

Las Vegas, NV 89119

733-3779

 

Annette Teijeiro, M.D.

Trustee

P. O. Box 93953

Las Vegas, NV 89193

837-3538

 

Arnold Wax, M.D.

Trustee

3730 S Eastern Ave

Las Vegas, NV 89109

952-3400

 

Ex Officio Members

 

John Ellerton, M.D.

Scholarship Fund Chairman

2020 W Palomino Ln #110

Las Vegas, NV 89106

384-0808

 

Michael Harter, Ph.D.

Vice Dean, UNSOM

2040 W Charleston Blvd # 400

Las Vegas, NV 89102

671-2230

 

Lynn Horne, M.D.

AMA Delegate

2915 W Charleston Blvd #4

Las Vegas, NV 89102

657-5620

 

Donald Kwalick, M.D.

Clark County Health Officer

625 Shadow Ln

Las Vegas, NV 89106

383-1201

 

Annette Mohs

CCMS Alliance Co-President

 

Marietta Nelson, M.D.

AMA Alternate Delegate

2020 Goldring Ave #401

Las Vegas, NV 89106

384-2020

 

Robert Shreck, M.D.

NSMA Past President

2225 E Flamingo Rd #101

Las Vegas, NV 89119

733-8803

 

Top

 

 

New Members for April 2003

Congratulations and Welcome to the Clark County Medical Society

Reinstated Member

 

Top

 

 

Membership Applicants To Go Before Credentialing Committee

If you have any pertinent information about the following membership candidates, please contact: 

Clark County Medical Society, 2590 E. Russell Rd., Las Vegas, NV 89120

 

 

For information on becoming a member of the Clark County Medical Society, call Marlaina Burns at 739-9989

 

Top

 

 

CEO Editorial

By Weldon (Don) Havins, M.D., J.D., CCMS CEO and Special Counsel

            Nevada is not the only state with medical liability reform activity.  In March alone, three states passed medical liability tort reform bills of substantial significance.

 

WEST VIRGINIA

            West Virginia's crisis can be characterized as worse than Nevada's when measured by the percentage of Ob-Gyns, orthopaedists, and neurosurgeons that left the state.  Two years ago the plaintiff attorney-friendly legislature passed "tort reform" which magnanimously "capped" non-economic damages at one million dollars and which "punished" insurance companies.  That, of course, did absolutely nothing to help the crisis.  Experienced, established physicians continued to leave the state.  The number of professional liability insurers shrank into the low single digits.

            The voting citizens of West Virginia expressed their disgust with the ability of the sitting legislators to ameliorate the situation.  Four physicians were elected to the lower house of their legislature, and the executive director of the West Virginia medical association was elected to the Senate.  On March 11, Governor Bob Wise (Democrat) signed House Bill 2122 into law.  This law takes effect July 1 and will lower the cap on noneconomic damages from $1,000,000 to $250,000 excepting for cases of wrongful death, permanent physical deformity or mental injury that precludes self-care.  In the later circumstances, the cap on noneconomic damages will be $500,000.  H.B. 2122 also eliminates Joint liability in favor of Several Liability only in medical negligence actions.  After July 1, West Virginia physicians will only be responsible to their degree of fault in medical negligence actions.  The deep pocket health care provider will be history in West Virginia. 

 

ARKANSAS

            On March 25, Arkansas Governor Mike Huckabee (Republican) signed emergency legislation that became effective on the same day.  H.R. 1038, known as the Civil Justice Reform Act of 2003, replaced joint and several liability with several liability only, except when a defendant acts in concert with another person or entity or that person or entity acts as a party's agent or servant. (This is similar to Nevada's comparative negligence law, NRS 41.141, wherein several liability applies when the plaintiff is partially at fault, unless the exceptions exist.)  Arkansas's new several liability is not absolute, however.  If a prevailing tort plaintiff cannot collect all damages from the liable defendants, the defendants who are able to pay are allocated the unpaid damages according to their degree of fault.  If a defendant's fault is 10% or less however, there is no allocation of damages on the defendant.  H.B. 1038 also capped punitive damages at $250,000 or three times compensatory damages, whichever is greater, with an absolute punitive damages cap of $1,000,000. 

            However, Arkansas' new law did not cap noneconomic damages.  The several liability provision is so conditional as to make it nearly worthless to other defendants when one of the defendants declares bankruptcy.  Because punitive damages are so very rarely awarded in non-intentional medical negligence actions, the punitive damages provision is virtually irrelevant.  One can reliably predict that the "smoke and mirrors" of Arkansas' H.B. 1038 will not significantly ameliorate Arkansas' medical liability crisis, and that the Arkansas legislature will be revisiting "real" medical liability reform in the not terribly distant future.

 

IDAHO

            Idaho Governor Dirk Kempthorne (Republican) signed H.B. 92 into law on March 26.  This law caps noneconomic damages at $250,000.  Their previous law, passed in 1987, capped noneconomic damages at $400,000 with a CPI indexing scheme.  The noneconomic damages cap under that scheme has risen to $682,000 with annual adjustments.  The non-indexed, stable $250,000 cap on noneconomic damages becomes effective on July 1st.  Joint liability will only apply when parties act in concert, when a person or entity acts as an agent or servant of another party, in cases of illegal toxic waste disposal, or in product liability of medical or pharmaceutical cases.  Several liability will apply in medical negligence actions.  H.B. 92 caps punitive damages at $250,000 or three times compensatory damages, which ever is greater.  Punitive damages will require "clear and convincing evidence" of oppression, fraud, malice, or outrageous conduct.

            Idaho's new law proves, once again, that indexing noneconomic damages does not control medical liability insurance premiums.  California's flat cap of $250,000 on noneconomic damages was implemented in 1975 and has remained at that level.  Under the provisions of MICRA,

including the stable $250,000 cap, California's medical liability insurance premiums have remained under control.

 

Top

 

 

Position of the Clark County Medical Society (CCMS) Regarding Proposed Nevada State Board of Medical Examiners (NSBME) Physician Competency Regulations for Re-licensure

 

            This statement represents the official position of the CCMS regarding the proposed regulations that the physician licensee has demonstrated continuing competency to practice medicine by accomplishing one of the following:

 

            "1. Holding current certification or re-certification by a member board of the American Board of Medical Specialties; or

            2. If certified by a member board of the American Board of Medical Specialties and not required to re-certify by the rules of such board to remain certified, have maintained active or associate hospital privileges at the Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations (JACHO)-certified hospital or hospital affiliated surgical/medical center for the two years preceding the commencement of the biennial registration period; or

            3. If not certified by a member board of the American Board of Medical Specialties, maintained active or associated hospital privileges for two (2) JACHO-certified hospitals or hospital-affiliated surgical/medical centers for the two years preceding the commencement of the biennial registration period; or

            4. Pass a Board approved peer review of the licensee's practice at the licensee's cost during the ten (10) years preceding the biennial registration period; or

            5. Within the ten (10) years preceding the commencement of the biennial registration period have taken and passed the Special Purpose Examination (SPEX) and/or one of its specialty modules of the Federation of State Medical Boards of the United States, Inc., with a minimum score of seventy-five percent (75%) or passed such other formal examination at the licensee's cost as may be approved at the board's discretion."

 

            It is the opinion of the CCMS that the above proposals will do nothing to improve the quality of health care provided by the physicians of Clark County and the State of Nevada.  In fact, it may force some of our most qualified physicians to leave Nevada leading to further erosion of the once very good health care that the people of Clark County enjoyed as little as two years ago prior to the medical malpractice crisis which continues.

            In addition:

            The CCMS proposes the creation of a "blue-ribbon" panel of experts in the field of peer-review to explore alternative methods of improving the quality of medical care for the people of Clark County and the State of Nevada.  There are, in the State of Nevada, individuals who have board certification in peer review and quality care medicine from whom this panel could be created.  A pilot study could then be undertaken in this area to formulate recommendations for continuous physician development.

 

 

Top

 

 

Minutes Synopsis

(Members can receive a full copy of meeting minutes by calling 739-9989.)

CLARK COUNTY MEDICAL SOCIETY BOARD OF TRUSTEES MEETING

Tuesday, April 15, 2003; 6:00 P.M.

Action Items

 

Committee Reports

 

Alliance Report

 

President's Report

 

Administrative Report

 

New Business

 

Top

 

 

Clark County District Court Medical Malpractice Filings Against Health Care Providers

Jan 2001 - Apr 2003

                       2001     2002    2003

Jan                   39        33       80

Feb                  20        14       72

Mar                  35        30       75

Apr                  37        34       74

May                 37        35

Jun                   27        24

Jul                    19        100

Aug                  54        51

Sep                  20        65

Oct                  37        83

Nov                 38        184

Dec                  9          170

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Top

 

 

Calendar of Events

 

Top

 

 

CME Calendar

Cardiovascular Consultants     691-9154

Clark County Medical Society     739-9989

7/19 - “The Physician as an Expert Witness,” 8:45 - 11 a.m., 2 CME hours

Future Programs Planned

August - “Patient Consent and Rights,”

            “End of Life”

September - “Health Care Fraud and Abuse”

St. Rose Hospital     616-5832

Southwest Medical Associates   242-7347

6/12 - “Office Management of Knee and Shoulder Injuries”

7/10 - “Pain and Addiction Challenges and Controversies”

Sunrise Hospital     731-8210

UMC     383-2604

Valley Hospital     388-4847

6/10 - “Diabetes,” noon

6/24 - “Medical Specialty: Politics,” noon

7/8 - “Immunizations for Children and Adults,” noon

7/22 - “Osteoporosis,” noon

 

*Special Note:  CCMS members can receive free CME courses on the internet with World Medical Leaders.

 

To have your CME courses listed on our calendar, please contact Deborah Barton at 739-9989 prior to the deadline

of the 12th each month.

Top

 

CLARK COUNTY HEALTH DISTRICT DISEASE STATISTICS* - APRIL 2003

 

DISEASE                                         CASES REPORTED           YEAR TO DATE

                                                    Apr. 2002   Apr. 2003         2002        2003

VACCINE PREVENTABLE DISEASES

DIPTHERIA                               0          0          0          0

HAEMOPHILUS INFLUENZA      0          0          3          2

          (invasive)                        

HEPATITIS A                             0          0          9          4

HEPATITIS B                             5          4          12         21

INFLUENZA                               6          17         57         45

MEASLES                                0          0          0          0

MUMPS                                    1          0          1          0

PERTUSSIS                              0          2          0          3

POLIOMYELITIS                        0          0          0          0

RUBELLA                                 0          0          0          0

TETANUS                                 0          0          0          0

SEXUALLY TRANSMITTED DISEASES

AIDS                                        28         17         82         72

CHLAMYDIA                            436       396       1546     1543

GONORRHEA                          153       164       544       576

HIV                                          27         16         56         75

SYPHILIS                                  3          2          4          3

          (Primary & Secondary)    

SYPHILIS (Early Latent)             0          1          3          11

ENTERICS

AMEBIASIS                              2          1          8          8

BOTULISM-INTESTINAL             0          0          0          1

CAMPYLOBACTERIOSIS           12         2          32         23

CHOLERA                                 0          0          0          0

CRYPTOSPORIDIOSIS              0          0          2          2

E. COLI O157:H7                       3          0          4          0

GIARDIASIS                              3          3          29         24

ROTAVIRUS                              66         55         256       300

SALMONELLOSIS                     11         4          51         20

SHIGELLOSIS                           1          2          1          8

TYPHOID FEVER                      0          0          0          0

YERSINIOSIS                            0          0          0          0

OTHER

ANTHRAX                                 0          0          0          0

BOTULISM INTOXIFICATION       0          0          0          0

BRUCELLOSIS                          0          0          0          0

COCCIDIOIDOMYCOSIS            4          2          10         11

ENCEPHALITIS                         0          0          1          0

HANTAVIRUS                            0          0          0          0

HEMOLYTIC UREMIC                0          0          0          0

            SYNDROME (HUS)

HEPATITIS C                             1          0          1          0

HEPATITIS D                             0          0          1          0

LEGIONELLOSIS                       0          0          0          1

LEPROSY (HANSEN'S DISEASE)          0          0          0          0

LEPTOSPIROSIS                      0          0          0          0

LISTERIOSIS                             0          0          0          0

LYME DISEASE                        0          0          0          1

MALARIA                                  0          0          1          0

MENINGITIS,                             2          14         20         27

            ASEPTIC/VIRAL

MENINGITIS, BACTERIAL          2          0          11         10

MENINGOCOCCAL DISEASE    2          1          10         3

PLAGUE                                   0          0          0          0

RABIES (HUMAN)                     0          0          0          0

RELAPSING FEVER                  0          0          0          0

ROCKY MOUNTAIN                   1          0          1          0

            SPOTTED FEVER

RSV (RESPIRATORY                140       129       1593     1256

          SYNCYTIAL VIRUS)        

TOXIC SHOCK SYNDROME       0          0          0          0

TUBERCULOSIS                       9          5          17         26

TULAREMIA                              0          0          0          0

             *Numbers include confirmed and probable cases

Top

 

 

Alliance Message

By Karen Schroeder, 2002-2003 CCMS Alliance President

            This article from me is my last as President of the Clark County Medical Society Alliance.  It has been a tremendous year and I would like to recap a "few" of the events from this year:

 

            I cherish the strong alliances that I have formed this year and look forward to working with many of you in the next few years.  Thank you for your comments, suggestions, and support during my year as president.

            The Alliance was again pleased to give out three nursing scholarships at our April general membership meeting/luncheon.  It was especially nice to have Dr. Michael Colletti join us.  He came in the capacity of the chairman of an ad hoc committee of the Clark County Medical Society; recruitment of people into the nursing profession.  Dr. Colletti had the opportunity to meet nursing students, instructors, and share with them and our group the concern that CCMS has in the diminishing numbers of practicing nurses in our Las Vegas community.  Certainly this is an area that will affect all Las Vegans and the Alliance will work with the CCMS on this issue.

            As you read this article our May Installation luncheon will have been held and the Alliances' executive board will have new leadership.  I look forward to working with Annette Mohs as Co-President of the CCMSA and her board.  Planning sessions are in full swing and it looks to be another exciting, fun-filled year.  If your spouse is not a member, please ask her/him to give me a call, 898-2595, to discuss membership.  There are many areas of involvement and "Greater the numbers, the stronger the voice, stronger the voice, more powerful the message".

 

Top

 

 

Classifieds