Clark County Medical Society
County Line
Newsletter 77 June 06
Contents
Urgent
Changes Needed to Address Our Nursing Shortage
President’s Message
Malpractice Filings Against Health Care Providers, Jan 2001 – Apr 2006
Member News
Southern Nevada Health Officer
Report
Alliance Message
NSMA’s
102nd Annual Meeting & Scientific Session held in Las Vegas has excellent
turn out
The
public has virtually nothing to do with who runs for office at any level
BOT Minutes
Classified Ads
CME Calendar
County Line Advertisers
Top
URGENT CHANGES NEEDED TO
ADDRESS OUR NURSING SHORTAGE
By Michael P.
Colletti, MDi & Weldon (Don) Havins,
MD, JD
Nevada's
population is about 2.6 million with over 70% of the population residing in
southern Nevada. By 2016, Nevada's
population will be 3.4 million, and most of that growth will occur in southern Nevada. The Department of HHS predicts that Nevada's
nursing shortage will accelerate from an 11% nursing shortage in 2000 (which
placed Nevada 50th out of the 50
states in nurses per 100,000 population) to a nursing
shortage of 27.5% in 2020ii.
Nevada's nursing
workforce, in concert with what is occurring nationally, is aging every
year. The average age of a nurse is 48
years old. The R.N. population under age
30 dropped from 25% in 1980 to 9% in 2000iii. From every perspective, Nevada's
nursing shortage crisis increasingly threatens the health, safety, and welfare
of its residents.
For several
years, we (the authors of this article) have been active members of the
Southern Nevada Medical Industry Coalition Nursing Education Committee. About three years ago, there was a shortage
of qualified nursing student applicants.
The Committee addressed that issue with brochures and other methods to
improve the quality of the applicant pool.
Johnson and Johnson Company developed television videos and advertised
the benefits of the nursing profession.
As a consequence, we now have an abundance of qualified applicants for
the available nursing school positions.
The committee has worked with hospitals, nurse recruiters and others to
entice out-of-state R.N.s to move to southern Nevada. Hospitals and other entities have made
extensive efforts to recruit nurses from other English-speaking countries. Unfortunately, every other state in the U.S.
has been attempting the same thing to augment their lagging nurse
workforce. The fact is -- there is a
nationwide nursing shortage - it just happens to be worse in southern Nevada
than anywhere else.
Clark
County is one of the fastest
growing counties in the nation with 6000 people moving here monthly. Less than 25% of the licenses issued by the
Nevada Board of Nursing in 2004-2005 were to new nurses graduating from Nevada
nursing schools. In sum, we have an
aging nursing population heading for retirement much faster than we are
training even their replacements; we are in an exploding population which needs
progressively more and more nurses; and we are training only a fraction of the
nurses we need in Nevada. The obvious solution to Nevada's
nursing shortage crisis is for our state to produce our own nurses in
sufficient numbers to meet our needs.
In 2003, in
an attempt to address this problem, the Legislature passed a Bill requiring state
nursing programs to double their enrollment.
Unfortunately, the Legislature did not adequately fund this
mandate. In spite of this, a few
programs, such as the A.D.N. (Associate Degree in Nursing) program at the Community
College of Southern Nevada
did double their nursing enrollment.
Other state schools were unable to meet the mandate. Even doubling enrollments, with every
enrolled student graduating, would not begin to satisfy Nevada's
acute nursing shortage.
Two years
ago the Nevada State College implemented an accelerated nursing program in
addition to their standard four year nursing program. The accelerated program provides that
applicants with a Bachelor's degree, who have completed the necessary prerequisite
courses, can earn a B.S.N. (Bachelor of Science in Nursing) in one year. This program, with little publicity, has
experienced a high number of qualified individuals applying for admission. The first class of 34 admitted students
included two physicians (a dermatologist and a general surgeon, both from the Philippines),
a graduate engineer, a former member of the State Department's diplomat corps,
two students with Masters degrees in business, a
former high school principal, and an accountant, among others with similar
distinguished careers. This first class
graduated 32 students. This academic
year there were over 80 qualified applicants for the Nevada State College
accelerated nursing program competing for the 40 available positions. UNLV is implementing a similar one year programiv.
When Touro University
contemplated a similar accelerated nursing program, Touro was informed that it
was illegal. The attorney general's
office quoted nursing statute NRS 632.450 which provides that "any
institution desiring to conduct a school of professional nursing in this State
shall submit evidence to the Board that it is prepared to give a course of
instruction of not less than 2 years."
Are private nursing schools being prejudiced by the selective enforcement
of this law while public nursing programs apparently are above this law? Clearly, this antiquated law, passed in 1973,
should be eliminated from our Nursing Practice Act.
As tax
paying citizens, we must demand accountability of our state nursing programs
and support those with proven records of productivity. Enrollment in state nursing programs is
important, and the education of those who would become nurse educators is very important.v
However, the efficiency in graduating nurses ready to take their
licensing exam must be the fundamental measure of the value of a nursing
program to tax paying Nevadans. The
programs that can produce nurses most cost effectively must be given priority
in tax dollar support. As taxpayers, we
must urge our Legislators to provide annual audits of state supported nursing
programs so that citizens can confirm that our tax dollars are being spent in
the most productive manner in educating nurses.
However,
the limited tax funds available for nursing education programs will not train a
sufficient number of nurses to satisfy the nursing needs of our growing
population. Private nursing programs
must supplement the production of nursing graduates. Four private institutions, all located in Henderson,
will be producing nurses for Nevada. Touro
University and the University
of Southern Nevada (formerly the
Nevada College of Pharmacy) have matriculated their first nursing
students. National
University has hired a nursing
program director and intends to develop a B.S.N. nurse education program. Apollo
College intends to begin an
Associate Degree in Nursing program. We must support the successful implementation
of these programs - none of which costs Nevada
taxpayers anything.
One aspect
of the nursing shortage, which has not been appreciated until recently, is the
unavailability of Masters- prepared nursing instructors, that is, R.N.s with a Masters degree in nursing to teach both
didactically and clinically. Currently,
in southern Nevada, there are
over 15 nursing faculty positions that are vacant in the public or private
colleges and universities, and these don't include the programs under
development. The State Board of Nursing
regulations require Masters-prepared nurses to teach all aspects of the nursing
curriculum. This "bottleneck"
in the system is adversely affecting the number of nurses that can be
matriculated to nursing programs. The
critical shortage of Masters-prepared nurses available for teaching will
increasingly impede Nevada's
production of nursing program graduates.
The small percentage of Masters-prepared nurses in Nevada generally
prefer to work for the hospital systems where pay is substantially greater than
that provided in schools of nursing. At
a minimum, our Legislators should provide for "market-rate" salaries
for Masters-prepared nurses entering nursing education in our state supported
programs. If this is not done,
Masters-prepared nurses produced by UNLV, Touro
University, and UNR will be
"lost" to the higher paying health care institutions.
The Southern
Nevada Medical Industry Coalition (SNMIC) and its Education Task Force have
researched other state nursing boards' regulations (Arizona,
California, and Oregon)
to understand how they have coped with this national issue of a lack of
Masters-prepared nurses to teach in their nursing programs. All three of these states utilize B.S.N.s as Clinical Instructors to educate R.N.
students. The addition of these
qualified and experienced B.S.N. nurses to the cadre of available nursing
instructors would greatly enhance the number of students Nevada
nursing programs could ultimately graduate.
The Nevada State Board of Nursing has, thus far, not been proactive in
facilitating this change in our Nursing Board regulations. When some members of the Nursing Board's
Education Advisory Committee are asked about instituting this change, the
pretext for resisting use of B.S.N. nurses as Clinical Instructors is that the
"quality of nursing education" would be adversely affected and
"we don't want to lower our standards." Our citizens would counter that the
fundamental "standard" critically important to Nevadans is an
adequate number of nurses to provide quality care to our residents.
The pretext
in those arguments is transparent. Nevada
hospitals would welcome nurses from any of those three states (Arizona,
California, and Oregon)
who would be interested in coming to Nevada
to work. There is no question of the
good quality of their nursing education graduates, and no evidence of lower
patient outcomes in the hospitals located in those states.
The Clark
County Medical Society is prepared to support a Legislative Bill which would
require the Nevada State Nursing Board to amend their regulations to permit
B.S.N. nurses to serve as Clinical Instructors in Nevada
nursing programs. If Nevada
is to educate its own nurses, and support the development of nursing programs,
this reasonable modification in the qualifications of Clinical Instructors is
both compelling and urgent. Additionally, the State Board of Nursing's
requirement of Masters-prepared nurses unreasonably impacts nursing education
in some other areas of nursing curricula.
B.S.N.-trained nurses with a law degree from an American Bar Association
accredited law school may not teach nursing law or ethics because the
individual does not have a Masters degree in nursing. It is patently absurd that a nurse with a law
degree is less qualified to teach nursing law than a Masters degree prepared
nurse without any formal legal education.
An individual with a Doctor of Pharmacology cannot teach pharmacology to
Nevada nursing students because
that individual does not have a Masters degree in nursing. What hubris reasons that medical students can
be taught pharmacology by a Doctor of Pharmacology, but nursing students cannot
be taught pharmacology from anyone other than a Masters-prepared nurse? The CCMS
Board of Trustees will support a Legislative Bill that amends the Nurse
Practice Act to ameliorate these illogical restrictions in Nevada
nursing education.
Together,
as we work to build a healthy Nevada,
we must ameliorate this growing nursing shortage crisis.
i Michael
P. Colletti, MD is immediate past-president of the Clark County Medical
Society. Weldon (Don) Havins, MD, JD, is
President-elect, Executive Director and Special Counsel of the Clark County
Medical Society.
ii Source: U.S.
Department of HHS National Center for Health Workforce analysis, 2005.
iii AACN
National Center
for Health Workforce analysis; The Registered Nurse Population: Findings from
the National Sample Survey of Registered Nurses, 2004.
iv Personal communication with Professor
Rosemary Witt, UNLV School of Nursing.
v A
study by the Southern Regional Board of Education in February 2002 documented a
serious shortage of nursing faculty. The
survey found that the combination of faculty vacancies (432) and newly budgeted
positions (350) pointed to a 12% shortfall in the number of nurse educators
needed. Unfilled faculty positions,
resignations, projected retirement, and the shortage of students being prepared
for the faculty role pose a threat to the nursing education workforce over the
next five years.
Top
President’s Message
By Ron Kline, MD,
2005-2006 CCMS President
WHAT I'VE LEARNED
This column
marks my last as CCMS president. I wanted to start by thanking our membership
for the support you have given me throughout the year. It has been an honor to represent you. Your kind words to me in the hallways about
my columns have inspired me more than you know.
(It's good to know my wife is not the only one reading my columns). I wish Florence Jameson the best of luck in
her coming year as president.
My special
thanks go to Don Havins, our current executive director and CCMS
president- elect. Don is both a skilled
ophthalmologist and lawyer. I (and we as
a society) have been blessed to have him as an advisor during this year. He has saved me from stepping on land mines
and helped me think through the implications of complex decisions. His support has given me the confidence to do
what needed to be done. He will make a
fine president in 2007-08.
Much of the
year has been occupied with trying to move the Health Sciences Center (HSC)
forward and trying to "earn a seat at the table." Many of us, including Don Havins, Ed
Kingsley, Mark Doubrava and others have worked hard to continually express our
interests and our thoughts to the powers that be to make them understand how
important this project is to the medical world we inhabit, and how important it
was for us to be involved in the process.
We have accomplished that this year.
The Advisory Board to the Regent's Committee on the HSC includes CCMS
board members Don Havins, Mark Doubrava, Mitchell Forman (Dean of Touro), John
McDonald (Dean of UNSOM) and I, as well as CCMS
members Steven Glyman, Gerald Higgins and State
Senator Joe Heck. NSMA
President Wayne Hardwick and NSMA Treasurer Richard Seher
round out the members of organized medicine in this group. We have fought hard to be included in the
process; now that we're there, we have to make it succeed! My thanks also go to Regents Bret Whipple
(chair of the Board of Regents) and James Dean Leavitt (chair of the Regent's
HSC committee), as well as Chancellor Jim Rogers, who all listened when we told
them how important this endeavor was to us, and that we could make it better by
being included.
A large
part of my year has also been spent trying to raise the political awareness of
physicians. Most of us still don't get
it. We continually complain about
malpractice rates, managed care hassles, and an impoverished Medicaid system
while choosing not to participate in the political and legislative processes that
ultimately control these issues. I think
I understand the mindset, although I do not agree with it. We feel that we have worked hard to get where
we are, that we work hard to provide our patients with competent and
sympathetic care, and that the rest of the world should realize that and leave
us alone to do our good work. Although
we may feel that way, the trial lawyers and insurance companies view us as
their fat and dumb prey. To the trial
lawyers, we are wealthy practitioners in a profession where bad outcomes
sometimes occur no matter how good and conscientious we are. The success of our profession has led to an
expectation of near perfection for diseases that were routinely fatal a few
decades ago. Remember that when trial
lawyers talk about victim's rights, they know that they receive 62% of all
malpractice settlements in expenses and fees.
To the
insurance companies, we are but interchangeable cogs in "provider
networks" that generate billions of dollars of profit for them, and
hundreds of millions of dollars in bonuses for their executives. We must work together in legal ways to
preserve the viability of our practices. Curiously neither the previous
Democratic administration nor the current Republican one view the continued
consolidation of insurance companies as an anti-competitive threat, although
the mere thought of doctors joining together seems to send the FTC into
convulsive action.
Many of us
were roused to political action in 2004 to support Question 3, and defeat
Questions 4 and 5. But like the great
citizen armies of centuries past, we have now gone back to our
stethoscopes. Yet the battle is far from
over. Two of the three Nevada Supreme
Court Justices who worked very hard to throw Question 3 off the ballot are up
for election this year with credible opponents.
We must put the same effort into electing supportive justices to the
Supreme Court as we did in passing Question 3, for the stakes are the
same! We can lose Question 3 in the
Nevada Supreme Court and it will be just as dead as if we lost at the ballot
box, or had it thrown off the ballot by those three justices in question. Furthermore, Question 3 is a series of laws,
not a constitutional amendment. That
means it can be changed by the legislature in the future (even during this
coming session) as long as the effective date is after November 24, 2007. I will again use the quote from Thomas
Jefferson that I have used before in this column, "the price of liberty is
eternal vigilance."
Once the
campaign season gets underway, members of CCMS
and the CCMS alliance (led by Annette Mohs)
will come to your office and ask you to display banners and literature
informing people about the candidates that are supportive of medicine. Please receive these people warmly and
display the banners and literature in your offices. We don't give money to campaigns like the
trial lawyers do ($41 per doctor in the last election cycle vs. $750 per
lawyer); we don't walk the precincts in support of our candidates like the
unions do; but we do have offices filled with patients who trust us with their
lives and the lives of their families, and care what we think about the people
running for elective office.
Only 105
physicians have paid the $300 it takes to become a member of MedPac, CCMS'
political action committee. If the physicians
of Clark County
gave to MedPac only half of what their anticipated increases in malpractice
insurance would be were it not for the passage of Question 3, and the defeat of
Questions 4 and 5, MedPac would be, by far, the largest and best financed PAC in
the State. If physicians gave to AMPAC
(the AMA PAC) only a small percentage of what they gained by having the AMA
turn a 4.5% Medicare decrease into a freeze (and similar efforts in years
past), AMPAC would be the wealthiest and most powerful PAC in the nation!
Because
only one third of Clark County
physicians are part of CCMS, another important
effort during my term of office has been increasing the benefits of
membership. Membership in both CCMS
and NSMA is $780. Add membership in the
AMA and we are in the range of $1200.
Add your specialty societies and the number only goes up from there (as
a member of five specialty societies, in addition to CCMS,
NSMA, and AMA, I understand this very well).
Undoubtedly the biggest financial benefit to our members is the 5%
discount on their malpractice insurance rates if they contract with PIC of Wisconsin
or Nevada Mutual. Also added to the list
this year has been the two year waiver of maintenance fees for those who choose
to use Allscripts electronic prescribing software, the waiver of medical staff
dues at the St Rose Hospitals, and a new credit card from Community Bank of
Nevada that gives members a 60 day no-interest grace period and overdraft and
credit card loans at the prime rate (currently 8%).
The most
heartening thing I have seen during my year as president, is the respect and
admiration that physicians still command in an increasingly cynical world. Because of the good work that most of us do
each day, we are still viewed as working largely for the benefit of our
patients. Our goal must be however, to
be politically aware, and to turn that respect into the political power that
allows us to preserve our profession against attacks from industries (e.g.
insurance and trial lawyers) that view the good work we do each day as fodder
for their personal enrichment.
Otherwise, we will be like the great Inca Empire; admired, respected and
EXTINCT!
Top
Clark
County District Court Medical Malpractice Filings
Against Health Care Providers,
Jan 2001 – March 2006
2001 2002 2003
2004 2005 2006
Jan
39
33 108
61 41 50
Feb
20
14
98 72
63 61
Mar
35
30 169
123 64 38
Apr
37
34 111
81 70 58
May
37
35 126
65 14
Jun
27
24 103
90 65
Jul
19 100
114 45 66
Aug
54
51
76 67 33
Sep
20 65
105 79 36
Oct
37
83 110
59 26
Nov
38 184
59 78 68
Dec
9 170
67 47 30
Sum
372 823
1246 867 581
Top
Member News
Congratulations
and Welcome to the Clark County Medical Society New Members –
May 2006
·
Eric J
Anderson, MD – Emergency Medicine, 1200 S. MLK Blvd., 2nd Fl.,
Las
Vegas,
NV 89102
·
Frank J Andriola, MD – Internal Medicine, 595 W. Lake Mead
Pkwy.,
Henderson, NV 89015
·
Jeffrey
L. Brown, DO – Family Practice, 595 W. Lake Mead
Pkwy.,
Henderson, NV 89015
·
Omar B Cabahug, MD – Neurology, 2500 Wigwam Pkwy., #112,
Henderson, NV 89074
·
Nicholas
G. Calica, MD – Internal Medicine, 1200 S. MLK
Blvd., 2nd Fl., Las Vegas, NV 89102
·
Russel P Clark, MD –
Emergency Medicine, 10441 W. Twain Ave., Las Vegas, NV 89135
·
Nam H Dang, MD – Internal Medicine, 10441 W. Twain Ave., Las Vegas, NV 89135
·
Prashant S Dani, MD – Pediatrics, 5575 S. Durango
Rd., #103,
Las
Vegas,
NV 89113
·
Gautam Daulat, DO – Internal Medicine, 4880 S. Wynn Rd., Las Vegas, NV 89108
·
Sandeep K Dhillon, MD – Pediatrics, 100 N. Green Valley Pkwy.,
#231, Henderson, NV 89074
·
Lisa A Durette, MD – Psychiatry, 7000 W. Spring Mtn. Rd., Las Vegas, NV 89117
·
Allen A Erisman, DO – Emergency Medicine, 1200 S. MLK Blvd., 2nd Fl.,
Las
Vegas,
NV 89102
·
Daniel C Fabito, MD – General Surgery, Las Vegas, NV
·
Louis M
Fink, MD – Pathology, 1 Breakthrough Wy., Las Vegas, NV 89135
·
Kimberly
A Fletcher, MD – Emergency Medicine, 1200 S. MLK Blvd., 2nd Fl.,
Las
Vegas,
NV 89102
·
Edward M
Harding, MD – Family Practice, 9499 W. Charleston Blvd., #150, Las Vegas,
NV 89117
·
John R Henner, DO – Emergency Medicine, 1200 S. MLK Blvd., 2nd Fl.,
Las
Vegas,
NV 89102
·
Patrick S
Hong, MD – Internal Medicine, 595 W. Lake Mead Pkwy., Henderson, NV 89015
·
Teresa O Hong, MD – Family Practice, 595 W. Lake Mead Pkwy., Henderson,
NV 89015
·
Yekaterina A Khronusova, MD – Internal Medicine, 1200 S. MLK Blvd.,
2nd Fl., Las Vegas, NV 89102
·
Dennis C
Lemon, DO – Emergency Medicine, 1200 S. MLK Blvd., 2nd Fl.,
Las
Vegas,
NV 89102
·
Vijaykumar Lingegowda, MD – Internal Medicine, 1200 S. MLK Blvd., 2nd Fl.,
Las
Vegas,
NV 89102
·
Yupo Ma, MD – Pathology, 1 Breakthrough Wy., Las Vegas, NV 89135
·
Lauri B Magee, MD –
Emergency Medicine, 1200 S. MLK Blvd., 2nd Fl., Las Vegas, NV
89102
·
Paul D Navar, MD – Emergency Medicine, 1200 S. MLK Blvd., 2nd
Fl., Las Vegas, NV 89102
·
Mitulkumar P Patel,
MD – Internal Medicine, 520 E. Fremont St., Las Vegas, NV 89101
·
Roy L Perlot, MD – Internal Medicine, 9499 W. Charleston
Blvd., #150, Las Vegas, NV 89117
·
Anita A Pomerantz, MD – Radiation Oncology, 10441 W. Twain Ave., Las Vegas, NV 89135
·
David A Pomerantz, MD – Radiation Oncology, 10441 W. Twain Ave., Las Vegas, NV 89135
·
Jennifer
S Rozum, MD – Emergency Medicine, 1200 S. MLK
Blvd., 2nd Fl., Las Vegas, NV 89102
·
Sana Safaei, MD – Family Practice, 4800 S. Wynn Rd., Las Vegas, NV 89103
·
Wade N
Sears, MD – Emergency Medicine, 1200 S. MLK Blvd., 2nd Fl.,
Las
Vegas,
NV 89102
·
Sandesh K Singh, MD –
Emergency Medicine, 1200 S. MLK Blvd., 2nd Fl., Las Vegas, NV
89102
·
Sunil Sharma, MD – Internal Medicine, 1200 S. MLK Blvd., 2nd Fl.,
Las
Vegas,
NV 89102
·
Geoffery L Stanczyk, MD – OB-Gyn, 98 E. Lake Mead Dr., #201,
Henderson, NV 89015
·
Rajendra K Suvarna, MD – Internal Medicine, 1200 S. MLK Blvd., 2nd
Fl., Las Vegas, NV 89102
·
Irfan Tahir, MD – Internal Medicine, 4880 S. Wynn Rd., Las Vegas, NV 89103
·
Dana L Trippi, DO – Emergency Medicine, 1200 S. MLK Blvd., 2nd Fl.,
Las
Vegas,
NV 89102
·
Nicholas
J Vogelzang, MD – Internal Medicine, 10441 W.
Twain Ave., Las Vegas, NV 89135
·
Bryan Y
Wong, MD – Internal Medicine, 10441 W. Twain Ave., Las Vegas, NV 89135
·
James R Zinser, MD – Family Practice, 4880 S. Wynn Rd., Las Vegas, NV 89103
·
Jonathan
R Zucker, MD – Anesthesiology, Las Vegas, NV
Reinstated
Members:
- Arthur J Taylor, MD – Orthopaedics
Student
Members:
- Kathryn G Mueller – Touro University
Physician’s
Assistant Members:
- Frederick B Bowles, PA – Supervising
Member: Byron Kilpatrick, MD
- Megan M Chipp,
PA – Supervising Member: John Henner, DO
- Eberhard J Maendel,
PA – Supervising Member: Wade Sears, MD
- Raymond Matheison,
PA – Supervising Member: John Henner, DO
- Richard J Nudd,
PA – Supervising Members: Wade Sears, MD
Applicants to Go Before Credentialing Committee
If
you have any pertinent information about the following membership candidates, please
contact:
Clark County Medical Society, 2590 E. Russell Rd., Las Vegas, NV 89120
- Edward S Ashman, MD – Orthopaedics
- Thomas C Kim, MD – Orthopaedics
- Susan A Miko,
DO – Internal Medicine
- Alison M Nguyen, MD – Diagnostic
Radiology
- Mark S Scheller,
MD – Anesthesiology
- Gary R Skankey,
MD – Infectious Disease
- Robert Toledo, DO – OB-Gyn
- Joseph F Urban, MD – Diagnostic
Radiology
For information on becoming a member of the Clark County Medical Society, call Marlaina Burns
at 739-9989.
***New Member Special*** $390 New members
can join for half price their first year.
Top
Southern Nevada Health District
Report
By Donald Kwalick,
MD, MPH, Chief Health Officer
The health district
monitors mumps cases
By Donald S. Kwalick,
MD, MPH, Chief Health Officer
The
Southern Nevada Health District is actively monitoring the mumps outbreak in Iowa
and neighboring states. No local cases of mumps have been reported in
connection with the outbreak. However, contagious people may occasionally
travel through our community potentially exposing others. Advisories on mumps
symptoms, transmission, prevention and environmental clean up have been
distributed to health care providers, hotels and resorts.
Although
the risk of exposure to mumps for most travelers is low, the health district is
encouraging the public to make sure they are fully vaccinated, especially those
who may be traveling to a state experiencing a mumps outbreak. As of May 5, the
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention is
reporting 13 states with one or more persons with mumps related to the current
outbreak. Most cases are among persons aged 18-24 years and the states
reporting cases are: Arkansas, Colorado,
Iowa, Illinois,
Kansas, Mississippi,
Missouri, Minnesota,
Nebraska, New
York, Pennsylvania, South
Dakota and Wisconsin.
To be fully
protected by vaccination:
l All
children 12 months to 4 years of age should have had one dose of MMR vaccine.
l All
school-aged children (K-12) and students attending post-high school educational
institutions should have had two doses of vaccine since 12 months of age and no
less than 28 days between doses.
l Adults who live in, or travel to, an
outbreak affected area should have at least one dose, unless they were
diagnosed by a physician with mumps earlier in life or have laboratory evidence
of immunity to mumps.
Most people
born in the United States
before 1957 had mumps and cannot get it again.
Persons who are unsure of their vaccination status,
or whether they had mumps in the past, may safely get the vaccine.
Southern
Nevada receives about 40 million visitors each year and can expect
persons incubating or ill with mumps will travel through our community
potentially exposing others. This is in addition to Southern Nevada
residents who may travel to affected areas and later return home after being
exposed to the mumps virus.
Because
people can unknowingly transmit the disease before the onset of their symptoms,
it is likely that infectious persons will travel to Nevada
and expose other visitors and residents. Unfortunately, there is no way to
identify these individuals, and no way to prevent transmission in these
situations. As a result, the control strategies of the health district focus on
the rapid identification of illness, isolation and prevention of disease
through vaccination, frequent hand-washing, and proper respiratory etiquette.
These
strategies have been shared with the resort and hotel industries in Southern
Nevada. Hotel and resort personnel may have the first contact with
a case if one occurs. The health district guidelines include referring the
guest to a physician for diagnosis, contacting the Office of Epidemiology,
isolation of the guest from the public areas of the establishment, and
following environmental clean-up guidelines.
To date,
the Iowa Department of Public Health is reporting more than 1,600 confirmed,
probable and suspect cases of mumps. From 2001 through 2005 there were 11 cases
of mumps reported in Clark County.
With the
low incidence of mumps in Clark County,
health care providers have become less likely to suspect mumps in patients with
parotitis. Because a number of diseases can cause parotitis, laboratory identification of the illness is
crucial for the proper diagnosis of mumps. Laboratory testing for mumps is
through direct cultures of the virus, or through testing of serum for mumps IgM antibody.
All known
or suspected cases of mumps should be reported to the Southern Nevada Health
District Office of Epidemiology at (702) 759-1300, option #2. This number is
available 24-hours, seven days a week. Additional information, including
technical bulletins may be accessed on the health district website at
www.cchd.org.
Top
Alliance
Message
By Pauline Lee & Andrea Yu, 2006-07 CCMS Alliance Co-Presidents
Whether it
occurs at a Fortune 500 Company, a parent-teacher association or volunteer
organization, a "changing of the guard" generates unbridled
enthusiasm, hopeful anticipation, and optimistic caution. As the new co-presidents of the Clark County
Medical Society Alliance, we share some or all of these emotions with our
members as we head into a year (2006-2007) replete with legislative and
health/safety advocacy challenges for the family of medicine.
As spouses
of physicians, our top priority is to assist our spouses in their mission to
provide the highest quality of healthcare in our community. To do that, the Alliance
should be and will be educating its members of opportunities to make a
difference at the ballot box. The Alliance's
enthusiasm and "grass roots" acumen was critical to the success of
last year's tort reform passage (Question 3).
This year, the Alliance's
legislative committee will be involved in various judicial races which directly
impact the preservation of last year's tort reform movement and the passage of
the Nevada Clean Indoor Air Act which impacts the future health of children in
our community. We look forward to the Alliance
working with the CCMS on these
initiatives.
The threat
of internet predators haunts parents of techno-savvy children of all ages. This year, the Alliance
will be participating in a state-wide alliance project named "Faux
Paw" aimed at educating children on how to use the internet without
disclosing personal information, without meeting any internet contacts and
without gaining access to inappropriate chat rooms or websites. The Alliance
will be introducing the internet safety program to private schools, initially,
with the intent to "spread the word" to the Clark
County School District
by year end. These two projects scratch
only the surface of the many activities engaged in by Alliance
members this upcoming year. Who makes up
the Alliance? Who becomes an Alliance
member?
Alliance
members are spouses committed to improving our communities and the lives of
physicians and families. We come from
different backgrounds